Religious/Ritual Object
Kesa
Japan. Edo period (1615–1868), 18th century. plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper. Explore the catalogue record, image rights and documented connections from The Art Institute of Chicago.
Follow the maker / Across collections & investigations
Japan across 1 collection
Each museum’s exact creator wording is preserved on its record. Reconciled maker links group works attributed directly to Japan while keeping workshop, studio, or “after” attributions distinct.
- Oribe-Type EwerThe Art Institute of Chicago · early 17th century · 1959.5 · Compare side by side →
- FurisodeThe Art Institute of Chicago · late Edo period (1789–1868), 1801/1868 · 1991.637 · Compare side by side →
- KesaThe Art Institute of Chicago · late Edo period (1789–1868), early 19th century · 1894.63 · Compare side by side →
- Seated BodhisattvaThe Art Institute of Chicago · 8th century · 1962.356 · Compare side by side →
A record, with reasons
Ways into this work
Open a description to see its meaning and evidence, or follow it into the collection.
Catalogue knowledge
Normalized from the museum’s record.
Religious/Ritual ObjectObject type
Religious/Ritual Object is a type of object named in the museum catalogue.
An explicitly supplied catalogue description, normalized conservatively. It does not independently establish attribution, completeness, symbolism or historical influence.
The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “Religious/Ritual Object” in its object type field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.
Religious/Ritual Object
Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1
PaperMaterial
Paper recorded in the object's medium.
A depicted material or colour resemblance is a separate assertion.
The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; paper (fiber product); silk (fiber); gilt-paper-strip-wrapped silk” in its medium/materials field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.
plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; paper (fiber product); silk (fiber); gilt-paper-strip-wrapped silk
Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1
SilkMaterial
Silk recorded in the object's medium.
A depicted material or colour resemblance is a separate assertion.
The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; paper (fiber product); silk (fiber); gilt-paper-strip-wrapped silk” in its medium/materials field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.
plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; paper (fiber product); silk (fiber); gilt-paper-strip-wrapped silk
Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1
WeavingTechnique
Weaving is a making process named in the museum catalogue.
An explicitly supplied catalogue description, normalized conservatively. It does not independently establish attribution, completeness, symbolism or historical influence.
The Art Institute of Chicago supplies “plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; compound weaving” in its medium/techniques field. This label was normalized by the documented import rule.
plain compound twill, double weave; silk and gilt-paper; compound weaving
Catalogue: The Art Institute of Chicago. Automated source-field normalization; no independent visual interpretation.
Source normalization checked 2026-10-21 · 2026-10-20.1
Visual observation
Observations of the displayed image.
Not yet assessed.
Artologium reading
Authored connections, open to interpretation.
Not yet assessed.
These descriptions belong to this object and its selected image. Unlisted features may be unassessed. Editorial observations and readings were developed with AI assistance; they do not establish the maker’s intent.
Keep something. Change the setting.
Follow a connection
A shared description opens a comparison. It does not establish historical influence.
